Information Systems Design for County Social Protection Programs in Kenya: Evidence from an Exploratory User Requirements Study
Main Article Content
Keywords
Social protection, Management Information Systems, County governments, Devolution, User requirements, Kenya
Abstract
The transition to devolved governance in Kenya created new demands for county-level social protection management information systems (MIS) capable of supporting local programmes while remaining interoperable with national systems. However, existing social protection MIS frameworks largely focus on centralized architectures with limited attention to county-specific user requirements. This study examined user requirements for the design of county social protection MIS in Kenya using an exploratory mixed-methods approach. The study was conducted between January and March 2025 across five purposively selected counties implementing active social protection programmes. A total of 30 respondents participated, including county social protection officials, NGO/CSO representatives, and community welfare committee members. Data were collected using structured questionnaires containing both closed-ended and open-ended items. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis in SPSS version 27, while qualitative responses were analyzed thematically. Findings showed that the most prioritised MIS design features were data sharing and multiple usage (26.7%), scientific beneficiary identification (23.3%), and decentralisation of services to local user points (20.0%). Weighted ranking analysis further confirmed that interoperability and targeting functions received the highest preference scores, while centralized governance structures received the lowest support. A chi-square test revealed a statistically significant association between stakeholder category and MIS design priorities (χ² = 18.62, df = 10, p = 0.045), indicating that system requirements vary according to institutional roles and operational experiences. Qualitative findings revealed strong support for modular system architecture, federated interoperability with the national Enhanced Single Registry, offline functionality, and partner coordination platforms. Respondents strongly rejected replication of national MIS systems at county level and instead preferred flexible systems tailored to county-specific programmes and local service delivery realities. The study concludes that county governments require federated, user-centered, and decentralised MIS frameworks that balance interoperability with operational autonomy. The study recommends development of modular county MIS platforms, interoperable national data standards, decentralised access structures, partner integration portals, and offline-first mobile data systems to strengthen social protection delivery within Kenya’s devolved governance system.
References
Barca, V., & Chirchir, R. (2014). Single registries and integrated MISs: De-mystifying data and information management concepts. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.opml.co.uk/files/2018-05/barca-chirchir-2014-data-information-management-social-protection.pdf
Cheeseman, N., Lynch, G., & Willis, J. (2016). Decentralisation in Kenya: The governance of governors. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 54(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X15001571
Chirchir, R., & Barca, V. (2019). Building an integrated and digital social protection information management system: Technical paper. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). https://www.giz.de/en/downloads/giz2019-en-integrated-digital-social-protection-information-system.pdf
Chirchir, R., & Kidd, S. (2020). Good practice in the development of management information systems for social protection. Development Pathways.
https://socialprotection-humanrights.org/resource/good-practice-development-management-information-systems-social-protection/
Development Pathways. (2024). Strengthening Kenya’s Single Registry to improve coordination.
https://www.developmentpathways.co.uk/our-work/strengthening-kenyas-single-registry-to-improve-co-ordination/
Development Pathways. (2025). Unifying Kenya's social assistance programmes. https://www.developmentpathways.co.uk/our-work/unifying-kenyas-social-assistance-programmes/
European Commission. (2017). Peer review on “Social protection information system (SPIS)”: Synthesis report. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=18856&langId=en
Gardner, C., Doyle, A., Farhat, M., & Brockerhoff, S. (2020). Opportunities of, and obstacles to, the utilisation of the Enhanced Single Registry. Oxford Policy Management. https://www.opml.co.uk/files/Publications/A2241-maintains/maintains-kenya-study-on-the-opportunities-of-and-obstacles-to-the-utilisation-of-the-esr.pdf
Gardner, C., Riungu, C., O’Brien, C., & Merttens, F. (2017). Evaluation of the Kenya Hunger Safety Net Programme Phase 2: The legacy of HSNP Phase 2—systems, practices and lessons learned. Oxford Policy Management. https://www.opml.co.uk/publications/evaluation-kenya-hunger-safety-net-programme-phase-2
Government of Kenya & UNICEF. (2017). Sector review of social protection in Kenya.
https://www.unicef.org/esa/sites/unicef.org.esa/files/2019-04/PER-and-Sector-Review-of-Social-Protection-in-Kenya-2017.pdf
Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success and local improvisations. The Information Society, 18(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290075039
Koech, C. C., & Ratemo, M. C. (2023). Integrated financial management information system in county treasuries in Kenya.
https://karuspace.karu.ac.ke/handle/20.500.12092/2966
Leite, P. G., George, T., Sun, C., Jones, T., & Lindert, K. A. (2017). Social registries for social assistance and beyond: A guidance note and assessment tool (Social Protection and Labour Discussion Paper No. 1704). World Bank Group. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/698441502095248081/pdf/117971-REVISED-PUBLIC-Discussion-paper-1704.pdf
MicroSave Consulting. (2021). A framework to design user-centric social protection programs. https://www.microsave.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/211115_A-framework-to-design-user-centric-social-protection-programs.pdf
Musumba, C. W. (2025). Organizational conditions for integrated financial management information systems’ implementation in five selected county governments in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, Maseno University).
O’Donnell, K. (2026). Contested visions for social protection in Kenya: The older persons cash transfer and the social registry. Politics and Governance, 14, Article 11219. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.11219
Odhiambo-Otieno, G. W. (2005). Evaluation of existing district health management information systems: a case study of the district health systems in Kenya. International journal of medical informatics, 74(9), 733-744. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505605000560
Republic of Kenya. (2012). Kenya social protection sector review. Ministry of Labour and Social Protection. https://vision2030.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Kenya-Social-Protection-Review-Final-June-2012.pdf
Republic of Kenya. (2025). The Social Protection Act, 2025 (Act No. 12 of 2025). Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 132. https://www.socialprotection.go.ke/sites/default/files/Downloads/public%20participation%20docss/Social%20Protection%20Act%202025%20KE.pdf
Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.
TRANSFORM. (2023). Management information systems in social protection.
https://transformsp.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/VER03.-24-MIS-BASE-DOCUMENT-FINAL-ipdf.pdf
UNICEF. (2021). Gender and social protection systems strengthening.
https://www.unicef.org/social-policy/social-protection
UNICEF. (2023). Design and development of Anguilla social protection MIS: Terms of reference. https://www.unicef.org/easterncaribbean/design-and-development-anguilla-social-protection-mis
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2021). Global research on governance and social protection: Kenya case study. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2021/04/Kenya_SP-Governance.pdf
World Bank. (2022). Digital transformation in public sector service delivery.
https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/digitaldevelopment/publication/digital-transformation-public-sector
Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2006). The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: A technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Management Science, 52(10), 1557–1576. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0485