Relationship Between Environmental Cost Disclosure and Financial Performance of Manufacturing and Construction Firms Listed in Nairobi Securities Exchange; The Moderating Effect of Firm Size

Main Article Content

Ruth J. Malakwen https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7114-6713
John K. Tarus https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4381-1896
Robert Otuya https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1151-6665

Keywords

Firm size, environmental cost disclosure, financial performance, Nairobi securities Exchange, manufacturing and construction companies

Abstract

Environmental issues have become increasingly prominent, driving the need for companies to operate transparently and responsibly. This study investigated the moderating effect of firm size on the relationship between environmental cost disclosures and financial performance among manufacturing and construction firms listed on the Nairobi Securities Exchange in Kenya. The study was guided by the stakeholder’s theory. Using a combination of explanatory and longitudinal research designs, the study analyzed data from audited annual reports of manufacturing and construction firms from 2014 to 2021. Data was coded into STATA version 17 and analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Results indicated that financial performance positively and significantly correlated with environmental costs (r=0.460, p < 0.01), firm size (r=0.416, p < 0.01). Also, environmental costs disclosure positively and significantly correlated with firm size (r=0.213, p < 0.05). The study further established that environmental cost disclosure (β =0.1273701, ρ-value <0.05) had a positive and significant effect on the financial performance of manufacturing and construction companies listed in Nairobi securities exchange. Further, the study found that firm size moderated the relationship between environmental cost disclosure (β= 0.0041, ρ<0.05) and financial performance of manufacturing and construction companies listed in Nairobi securities exchange. This result suggests that the impact of environmental cost disclosure on financial performance is indeed influenced by firm size. Managers should prioritize the transparent reporting of environmental costs, as these disclosures have been shown to positively impact financial outcomes. Hence, firms can demonstrate their commitment to sustainability and responsible business practices, which in turn can attract investors and stakeholder trust.

Abstract 12 | PDF Downloads 7

References

ACCA (2016). Statement of Common Principles of Environmental disclosure of the Corporate Reporting Dialogue, UK reports.

Al-Waeli, A., Ismail, Z., Hanoon, R., & Khalid, A. (2022). The Impact Of Environmental Costs Dimensions On The Financial Performance Of Iraqi Industrial Companies With The Role Of Environmental Disclosure As A Mediator. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 119(13).

Amelia, M. R. (2012). Effect of firm characteristics, financial performance and environmental performance on corporate social responsibility disclosure intensity on manufacturing firm listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Faculty of Economy, Gunadarma University.

Bendell, J. (2017). Terms for endearment: Business, NGOs and sustainable development. Routledge.

Blowfield, M., & Blowfield, M. (2013). Business and sustainability. Oxford University Press.

Cho, C. H., Roberts, R. W., & Patten, D. M. (2010). The language of US corporate environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(4), 431-443.

De Beer, P., & Friend, F. (2006). Environmental accounting: A management tool for enhancing corporate environmental and economic performance. Ecological economics, 58(3), 548-560.

Derila, C. P., Evana, E., & Dewi, F. G. (2020). Effect of environmental performance and environmental costs on financial performance with CSR disclosure as intervening variables. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 8(1), 37-43.

Derila, C. P., Evana, E., & Dewi, F. G. (2020). Effect of environmental performance and environmental costs on financial performance with CSR disclosure as intervening variables. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 8(1), 37-43.

Duttagupta, A., Islam, M., Hosseinabad, E. R., & Zaman, M. A. U. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability: a perspective from the oil and gas industry. Journal of Nature, Science & Technology, 2, 22-29.

Geçici, M. E., & Türnüklü, E. (2021). Visual Reasoning in Mathematics Education: A Conceptual Framework Proposal. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 14(1), 115-126.

Hossain, M M. (2016). Environmental Reporting Practices in annual Reports of selected pharmaceutical and chemical companies in Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 5(7), 20-28.

Kassa, E. T. (2021). Factors influencing taxpayers to engage in tax evasion: evidence from Woldia City administration micro, small, and large enterprise taxpayers. Journal of innovation and entrepreneurship, 10(1), 8.

Mikial, M., Marwa, T., Fuadah, L., & Meutia, I. (2019). The effects of environmental performance and environmental information disclosure on financial performance in companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Archives of Business Research, 7(11), 67-77.

Qian, W., Hörisch, J., & Schaltegger, S. (2018). Environmental management accounting and its effects on carbon management and disclosure quality. Journal of cleaner production, 174, 1608-1619.

Schaltegger, S., & Csutora, M. (2012). Carbon accounting for sustainability and management. Status quo and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 36, 1-16.

Shahwan, Y., & Esra'a, B. (2021). The impact of earning management and social and environmental costs disclosure on financial performance: An empirical study in Jordan. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1-10.

Tarus, J. K. (2020). Do board size and firm size affect environmental accounting disclosure? Evidence from selected listed firms in kenya. Journal of Business Management and Economic Research (JOBMER), 4(1), 21-37.